Merge fd5ab9f1f3 into f2539bbe34

apparently, even if MI_USE_CXX is OFF, mimalloc still provides mangled definitions of new/delete operators. It causes inability to statically link mimaloc in our scenario, since we want to have our own overrides of new/delete functions.

src/alloc-override.c

@@ -189,7 +189,6 @@ typedef void* mi_nothrow_t;
   void* operator new[]( std::size_t n, std::align_val_t al) noexcept(false) { return mi_new_aligned(n, static_cast<size_t>(al)); }
   void* operator new  (std::size_t n, std::align_val_t al, const std::nothrow_t&) noexcept { return mi_new_aligned_nothrow(n, static_cast<size_t>(al)); }
   void* operator new[](std::size_t n, std::align_val_t al, const std::nothrow_t&) noexcept { return mi_new_aligned_nothrow(n, static_cast<size_t>(al)); }
-  #endif
 
   #elif (defined(__GNUC__) || defined(__clang__))
   // ------------------------------------------------------
@@ -234,6 +233,7 @@ typedef void* mi_nothrow_t;
   #else
     #error "define overloads for new/delete for this platform (just for performance, can be skipped)"
   #endif
+  #endif
 #endif // __cplusplus
 
 // ------------------------------------------------------