kiper220/mimalloc
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/microsoft/mimalloc.git synced 2025-05-03 22:19:32 +03:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

fix new/delete overrides

Browse source 
apparently, even if MI_USE_CXX is OFF, mimalloc still provides mangled definitions of new/delete operators. It causes inability to statically link mimaloc in our scenario, since we want to have our own overrides of new/delete functions.
This commit is contained in:
Eduard Voronkin 2024-11-06 12:02:22 -08:00
parent 54940a6a65
commit fd5ab9f1f3
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
src/alloc-override.c
View file

@ -189,9 +189,8 @@ typedef void* mi_nothrow_t;
void* operator new[]( std::size_t n, std::align_val_t al) noexcept(false) { return mi_new_aligned(n, static_cast<size_t>(al)); }
void* operator new (std::size_t n, std::align_val_t al, const std::nothrow_t&) noexcept { return mi_new_aligned_nothrow(n, static_cast<size_t>(al)); }
void* operator new[](std::size_t n, std::align_val_t al, const std::nothrow_t&) noexcept { return mi_new_aligned_nothrow(n, static_cast<size_t>(al)); }
#endif
#elif (defined(__GNUC__) || defined(__clang__))
#elif (defined(__GNUC__) || defined(__clang__))
// ------------------------------------------------------
// Override by defining the mangled C++ names of the operators (as
// used by GCC and CLang).
@ -234,6 +233,7 @@ typedef void* mi_nothrow_t;
#else
#error "define overloads for new/delete for this platform (just for performance, can be skipped)"
#endif
#endif
#endif // __cplusplus
// ------------------------------------------------------