kiper220/mimalloc
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/microsoft/mimalloc.git synced 2025-05-20 22:19:30 +03:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

spelling: the

Browse source 
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
Josh Soref 2023-03-19 18:43:03 -04:00
parent ddb525d85c
commit f6647febe5
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
doc/mimalloc-doc.h
View file

@ -1276,6 +1276,6 @@ range of benchmarks.
See the [Performance](https://github.com/microsoft/mimalloc#Performance) See the [Performance](https://github.com/microsoft/mimalloc#Performance)
section in the _mimalloc_ repository for benchmark results, section in the _mimalloc_ repository for benchmark results,
or the the technical report for detailed benchmark results. or the technical report for detailed benchmark results.
*/ */

2
docs/bench.html
View file

@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ $(document).ready(function(){initNavTree('bench.html',''); initResizable(); });
<div class="contents"> <div class="contents">
<div class="textblock"><p>We tested <em>mimalloc</em> against many other top allocators over a wide range of benchmarks, ranging from various real world programs to synthetic benchmarks that see how the allocator behaves under more extreme circumstances.</p> <div class="textblock"><p>We tested <em>mimalloc</em> against many other top allocators over a wide range of benchmarks, ranging from various real world programs to synthetic benchmarks that see how the allocator behaves under more extreme circumstances.</p>
<p>In our benchmarks, <em>mimalloc</em> always outperforms all other leading allocators (<em>jemalloc</em>, <em>tcmalloc</em>, <em>Hoard</em>, etc) (Jan 2021), and usually uses less memory (up to 25% more in the worst case). A nice property is that it does <em>consistently</em> well over the wide range of benchmarks.</p> <p>In our benchmarks, <em>mimalloc</em> always outperforms all other leading allocators (<em>jemalloc</em>, <em>tcmalloc</em>, <em>Hoard</em>, etc) (Jan 2021), and usually uses less memory (up to 25% more in the worst case). A nice property is that it does <em>consistently</em> well over the wide range of benchmarks.</p>
<p>See the <a href="https://github.com/microsoft/mimalloc#Performance">Performance</a> section in the <em>mimalloc</em> repository for benchmark results, or the the technical report for detailed benchmark results. </p> <p>See the <a href="https://github.com/microsoft/mimalloc#Performance">Performance</a> section in the <em>mimalloc</em> repository for benchmark results, or the technical report for detailed benchmark results. </p>
</div></div><!-- contents --> </div></div><!-- contents -->
</div><!-- PageDoc --> </div><!-- PageDoc -->
</div><!-- doc-content --> </div><!-- doc-content -->